Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry
I re-read his artcile. It's not as nutty as the stuff that comes out of the Discovery Institute, but it's still embarrassing.

I've noticed that the neo-cons tend to oppose evolution. William Kristol has expressed his opposition numerous times, so it's not suprising that his rag should print such a piece. Neocons are not religious, so I wonder what their motivations are. Any thoughts?

16 posted on 03/22/2005 7:56:34 AM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: curiosity

Aren't you curious? The thought is that modern science has not borne out the established darwinian hypotheses. It is worse than useless, it is wrong...except for limited selection effects that remove information from the gene pool.


21 posted on 03/22/2005 8:00:32 AM PST by metacognative (eschew obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson