I am more comfortable relying on court documents than on the word of internet doctors (LOL) and the absolutely speculative chatter that is out there about this case. Others seem to feel differently.
And Terri has had 3 guardian ad litems and they all agreed that she is PVS and beyond help. She has had numerous tests through the years.
How many doctors and how many tests do we need to conduct in order for people to rely on their veracity?
Peach, wasn't one of those guardians Judge Greer, in a blatant conflict of interest? And since another one of the GAL's didn't follow through on the tests he wanted to see done, I disagree on how well served she was by her guardians.
There are a heck of a lot more than just internet doctors that dispute the diagnosis of PVS. Furthermore there are credible reports from multiple witnesses of altered medical charts and discarded notes; the unanswered questions about denial of therapy; unanswered questions about the cause of her condition; discrepancies in the husband's testimony in the malpractice suit vs. his later statements; substantial errors in law by Judge Greer; conflicts of interest in the appointment of guardians; the inappropriateness of a blind judge to consider a case with substantial visual evidence; and many other items that together cause very considerable doubt that this case has been properly adjudicated.