To: ContraryMary
You've got nothing. The "Quackbusters" article is one doctor's opinion. And even that opinion is does not support your assertion. Way to dodge the criticism of your source. Your claim that Hammesfahr is a quack is destroyed.
To: thecabal
Get your facts straight. There was more than one doctor in one article. So... does that destroy your argument that destroyed mine?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson