Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RayChuang88

But the problem is the length (plus the separation, in the case of IFR). There was a grand plan to use landfill to both extend the runways and increase separation. It was shot down by the watermelons (green on the outside, red on the inside). You'll see ... when the time comes for routing, very few if any 380s will actually touch SFO ...


28 posted on 03/22/2005 9:02:54 AM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: GOP_1900AD; RayChuang88
But the problem is the length (plus the separation, in the case of IFR). There was a grand plan to use landfill to both extend the runways and increase separation.

How do you increase separation of runways that already exist? Doesn't that imply tearing out existing portions of runways?

31 posted on 03/22/2005 5:06:17 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (I Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: GOP_1900AD

Actually, according to SFO officials, A380 operations will be like that of 747-400 operations--no side-by-side landings and takeoffs. Given the fact that relatively few airlines will fly the A380 to SFO until at least 2010 (only Singapore Airlines and Lufthansa has planned flights to SFO officially for now), the runway spacing issue will not be significant.


47 posted on 03/22/2005 7:41:30 PM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson