You guys are convicting schiavo without any evidence. Everything has been hearsay. These threads on thi site and other sites kinda reminds me of the experiment back in school where the teacher would tell the student in the first seat a message and by the time it got to the back the message was completely different.
Some of you are convicting schiavo without any evidence whatsoever. Example: Some say he was a nurse when his wife was unconsious and later it was proven he was a nurse later.
This hi-tech lynching of Mike schiavo makes ABC's work of "convicting" Richard Jewell pale in comparison.
Nobody's convicting anybody.
Does someone here have Michael in custody?
Anybody here got judge's robes on or a gallows being built?
These are attempts to get to the bottom of the truth about -what- caused an otherwise healthy person to up and collapse for no "apparent" reason.
[and to question why he let her lay there for so long after the collapse, doing -nothing-]
Questions have not and -are- not being asked, much less answered.
Does this make you feel better?
*If* Michael is completely innocent of any wrongdoing, may God forgive me for ever thinking it so.
[but my gut, the evidence and how things have been "handled" thus far compels me to suspect otherwise]
I [and most others] merely want the possibility investigated.
See posts
#88
#109
and #147
These are not "hearsay" these are verified by any source that discloses them. (example: the MSM doesn't mention MC's second woman, but it doesn't deny it either. Lifenews.com, however, releases this information freely.)