From what I understood, the baby was terminal and did have a chance.
IMO, the hospital did the right thing.
From what I understood, the baby was terminal and did not have a chance.
(forgot the not)
uh... didn't?
However, aside from the confusion that typo could cause... many doctors have said "so and so doesn't have a chance" in order to justify removing feeding tubes etc, and only because there were those that opposed them did the person have a chance to actually recover and prove them wrong. There has to be a more concrete definition of 'doesn't have a chance.'