Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sonofagun
Based upon what authority, counselor.

A temporary ruling reinstating the feeding tube is injunctive relief. In order to make such a ruling, the judge is required to satisfy the standards of Federal law for such relief. Or do you want him just to make it up as he goes, because of the exegencies? Careful what you wish for...

60 posted on 03/21/2005 3:07:09 PM PST by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: lugsoul

Hmmmm, are you suggesting that federal standards ignore the fact that someone may very well die in the meantime?


82 posted on 03/21/2005 3:14:02 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: lugsoul
Or do you want him just to make it up as he goes, because of the exegencies?

Well, yeah.

Exegencies = a person's life. An innocent person, who, by the way is a victim of the vagaries of the legal system.

In my view, she should be safely tucked away in federal custody pending the outcome of the hand of justice.

If the judge sits on this case without a decision untill she dies, then everything is, moot, is that the term?

No person should have that power over an innocent citizen of this country.

And according to my layperson's view of the constitution, Terri has certain rights that the federal government is obliged to protect.

101 posted on 03/21/2005 3:21:39 PM PST by sonofagun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson