Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ambrose

Refusal to grant the injunction in these circumstances is reversible error. The refusal denies Terri a hearing on the merits. The substantial liklihood rule does not obtain here. It is ludicrous.


50 posted on 03/21/2005 3:03:24 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Torie

I am talking about refusal to issue a ruling. There is no appellate review until he issues his ruling.

When Sander Sauls issued his ruling, he did it from the bench, rather than in writing, so Gore would have time to appeal. Judges usually do that sort of thing, even when they're r uling against you... but not always.


54 posted on 03/21/2005 3:05:15 PM PST by ambrose (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson