To: GaltMeister
A prerequisite for the issuance of an injunction under Federal law is that the movant have a "substantial likelihood of success on the merits" as the case goes forward. That is what the judge is talking about.
I'm sure you want the judge to just follow the law, right? Not be a judicial activist and make a ruling based upon how he feels?
29 posted on
03/21/2005 2:58:21 PM PST by
lugsoul
(Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
To: lugsoul
I'm sure you want the judge to just follow the law, right? Not be a judicial activist and make a ruling based upon how he feels? Hey, NOSOUL er LUGSOUL, at the very least, preserve Terri's life while the case winds its way through the federal judicial process!
To: lugsoul
I'm sure you want the judge to just follow the law, right? Not be a judicial activist and make a ruling based upon how he feels? what rock have you been hiding under? the very problem IS that the judges have become activist and ARE making, rather than upholding, laws
115 posted on
03/21/2005 3:25:49 PM PST by
maine-iac7
(."...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
To: lugsoul
Judge Greer has had Terri in hospice for years; from what I understand (not a lawyer!) that's not legal.
And just where has that gotten Terri.
Hungry.
With all the questionable things going on, if the judge cannot see something can change during a new examination of the relevant issues.....
150 posted on
03/21/2005 3:49:28 PM PST by
freecopper01
("There is One who will judge all.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson