Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PistolPaknMama

PistolPaknMama,

If the judge did say a comment along the lines of how long Terri lasted last time and that he has time, I'm thinking (not a lawyer!) that it shows clear prejudicial disregard for the life of the plaintiff. I don't think I said it correctly, but I believe you can get the gist of it.


244 posted on 03/21/2005 6:00:40 PM PST by freecopper01 ("There is One who will judge all.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]


To: freecopper01
If the judge did say a comment along the lines of how long Terri lasted last time and that he has time, I'm thinking (not a lawyer!) that it shows clear prejudicial disregard for the life of the plaintiff. I don't think I said it correctly, but I believe you can get the gist of it.

I'm with you on that. The difference between us and the judge, however, is that we care about her life. The judges have been/are only interested in facts (as they interpret them) and the law (as they interpret those too). Not saying at all that this judge isn't pro-death. It isn't like this is a case the judge hasn't heard about already or even discussed with his peers for the last year. There is no way he came on the scene without an impression of what he would have done had he been in Greer's seat.

But to let her lie there and deteriorate futher while he's out have dinner tonight, thinking about things, is just evil. If he decides in two days the case has merit, it won't do any good if Terri is dead.

280 posted on 03/21/2005 7:13:12 PM PST by PistolPaknMama (Will work for cool tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson