[Destro]

Thank you for a great example to allow me to explain my view. The court had three sets of opinions in the matter. They had the husband's experts, the had the parents' expert and they had a trail appointed expert. The Court ruled that the neutral court appointed expert agreed with the findings of the husband's medical experts that she is in a nonreversable PVS .

The court found the claims of the parents' experts as not being credible.

Several appeal courts including it going twice to the federal courts and the Supreme court upheld this medical finding and in fact every ruling of this court case made by the judge - a ruling that follows Florida State law on this matter.

To explain away this the Schindler parents supporters have come up with complex conspiracy theories saying the court appointed doctor was biased as was the judge.

Your opinion and mine should not matter in this private affair.

[LauraleeBraswell]

This isn't a private matter. This is a public matter.

1- The family of Terri decided to make it public.
2- We pay taxes to the court system
3- It was in a public hospital
4- This is a crime against Terri
5- Accusations that Michael Shiavo commited a crime
by injecting his wife with something
6- Beliefs that Michael Shiavo is acting is SELF INTEREST and not in the interests of Terri by halting reabilitation.

So, does a husband have the right to kill his wife? No, he doesn't.

As President Bush said "It is better to Err on the side of life"