To: TheDon
It would definitely be in the best interests of VCs making money to have taxpayers fund their risk. Aside from the risk factor, the real problem is that research usually benefits someone other than the person funding it -- that's just the nature of research. So to be fair, most technology research has to be broadly funded. Up until the Clinton Administration, the vast majority of technology funding came from the federal government for this reason, but was then decried as "corporate welfare", and slashed. Welfare, yeah, show me any other welfare spending that has a 1000% ROIC.
VCs lose a lot of money on technology R&D.
No, they do not. VCs invest in businesses, which involve some development but certainly not research.
15 posted on
03/21/2005 10:00:09 AM PST by
HolgerDansk
("Oh Bother", said Pooh, as he chambered another round.)
To: HolgerDansk
Aside from the risk factor, the real problem is that research usually benefits someone other than the person funding it -- that's just the nature of research.
Indeed. Another problem is that any benefits from research are long term; research has a negative impact on the current quarter's bottom line, and American business has become seriously short sighted.
17 posted on
03/21/2005 11:10:52 AM PST by
Celtman
(It's never right to do wrong to do right.)
To: HolgerDansk
No, they do not. VCs invest in businesses, which involve some development but certainly not research. I agree, and government funded research is the rare exception where government spending really pays off.
19 posted on
03/21/2005 11:22:10 AM PST by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson