To: Edward Watson
Sir,
You are shoveling s**t against the tide here. It's artificial to feed her for FIFTEEN YEARS with a tube but the emotional jury here will never see that.
However, if THEY were getting the medical bill for her storage, vice everyone who has insurance, who foots the bill for the insurance settlement since it is spread-loaded around the industry, they'd be pulling that tube ASAP.
247 posted on
03/21/2005 9:51:34 AM PST by
HMFIC
(Fourth Generation American INFIDEL and PROUD OF IT!)
To: HMFIC
The nurses who have cared for her in the past have stated that the tube is for convenience only. She is able to swallow reflexively, so she could swallow liquified food. It just would take some time to feed her, time that most hospices/hospitals lack.
256 posted on
03/21/2005 9:57:57 AM PST by
ex 98C MI Dude
(Proud Member of the Reagan Republicans)
To: HMFIC
Of course. Either I'm stupid for swimming against the tide; have a masochist complex for abuse or simply not afraid to speak the truth.
Take your pick.
To: HMFIC
She was eating from a spoon some, but it was too expense, so Schivo had the tube installed.
359 posted on
03/21/2005 10:50:43 AM PST by
conservativewasp
(Support John Kerry......... Ho Chi Minh would. Damn! Now I need a new tagline.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson