Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Federal Court Reviewing Right-To-Die Case
Reuters via Yahoo! ^ | 03/21/05 | Reuters

Posted on 03/21/2005 5:25:35 AM PST by Brilliant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
This is not a "right-to-die" case. She's not asking to die. It's really a euthanasia case.
1 posted on 03/21/2005 5:25:37 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

She is being killed. In the most gruesome and inhuman way imaginable.


2 posted on 03/21/2005 5:27:38 AM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Meanwhile, as the Federal Judge reviewing the case sips his coffee, munches on a donut, and adjusts his reading glasses as he sifts through the two-page bill and the ton of documents Felos plopped on his desk, Terri has been without a drop of water for nearly three days. Should he not allow her hydration WHILE he studies the case?


3 posted on 03/21/2005 5:29:07 AM PST by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Truly hope I am proven wrong any second, but this judge knew the case was coming, and he knew that Terri is being starved. The mere fact he didn't choose to sign an order in the middle of the night is not a good sign. Maybe he and his clerks are reviewing things very carefully, but believe me the judge could have kept the lawyers there and ruled at 2 AM. Unless he rules very soon, it concerns me that he did not act quickly even with a denial, knowing the Schiavos have precious little time to take an appeal to Atlanta.


4 posted on 03/21/2005 5:30:26 AM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

"U.S. District Judge James D. Whittemore, whom Clinton appointed in 1999, received the lawsuit filed by Terri Schiavo's parents "


5 posted on 03/21/2005 5:30:52 AM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

I can't overstate the importance of this being a Clinton appointee. This may well have landed in the hands of a judge who is totally opposed to the action Congress took. And whichever way he rules, I find it offensive that time is passing like this. The judge knows this case is an emergency with a capitol "E" It is not a good sign that he is sitting on this, knowing what is transpiring during the delay.


6 posted on 03/21/2005 5:33:51 AM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

Does dapper dan Michael Schiavo get more money when she dies? It's suspicious why he hasn't divorced her. He lived with her for five years only and only after a settlement of several hundred thousand dollars did he remember her death wish. He's lived with his present babe for ten years and has two children with this second woman he calls his fiancee. What constitutes bigamy? How can he have a financee when he is still married to Terri? Something smells.


7 posted on 03/21/2005 5:35:42 AM PST by dimmer-rats stealvotes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham
Not according to the NYT, but others say different more here
8 posted on 03/21/2005 5:37:17 AM PST by traderrob6 (http://www.exposingtheleft.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

Does dapper dan Michael Schiavo get more money when she dies? It's suspicious why he hasn't divorced her. He lived with her for five years only and only after a settlement of several hundred thousand dollars did he remember her death wish. He's lived with his present babe for ten years and has two children with this second woman he calls his fiancee. What constitutes bigamy? How can he have a financee when he is still married to Terri? Something smells.


9 posted on 03/21/2005 5:37:35 AM PST by dimmer-rats stealvotes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Michael alleges that Terry made comments indicating she would not want to be nourished via feeding tube.

Friends relate that Michael made statements to the effect,
'She's 26 years old. Why would we have talked about that?'

My observation:
Why would the conversation have led to the distinction between "life support" and "feeding tubes"?

How did she get in this condition?
He asserts that it was a "Heart attack" brought on by a "Chemical imbalance".
I ask, 'Where is the medical history of ANY other persons encountering 'heart attack via chemical imbalance', at the age of 26, given an otherwise healthy patient?

Why has there been no law enforcement review of this case, relating to "cause"?
The "husband" should not be able to block review of his culpability!


10 posted on 03/21/2005 5:40:19 AM PST by G Larry (Aggressively promote conservative judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
"I don't know what her wishes were, but neither do any of you," he said.

Exactly...Then why decree based on heresay to KILL her!!

This is the logical of someone who believes lying with another man is normal and should be celebrated.

11 posted on 03/21/2005 5:40:49 AM PST by sirchtruth (Words Mean Things...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shezza

It strikes me the judge is taking as much time off the clock as he can "reasonably" accomplish by sitting on this into the morning. Believe me, the judge could have signed the TRO without opinion within an hour. One important point is that a TRO can only be in effect 10 days before a hearing is held, so the fact the judge didn't do that and prepare for a hearing in ten days certainly concerns me.


12 posted on 03/21/2005 5:42:53 AM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

Hasn't the Supreme Court ruled that denying prisoners food and water is "cruel and unusual punishment?"


13 posted on 03/21/2005 5:46:31 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Williams

I agree the order to reinsert the feeding tube should be made instantly while he considers the case. I'm not one who thinks she has a federal case, but miracles happen and anyway she should not be suffering unneccessarily during the consideration and appeals of her case.


14 posted on 03/21/2005 5:46:44 AM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: shezza

Perhaps you need coffee and a donut. :-)


15 posted on 03/21/2005 5:48:13 AM PST by verity (The Liberal Media and the ACLU are America's Enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
I'll bet there are plenty of judges at all levels that are really enraged at what they view as congressional usurpation of their exalted powers.

I hope this judge isn't one of them. If he is also a Clinton appointee, all the more reason for us having the willies.

Leni

16 posted on 03/21/2005 5:49:43 AM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: verity

I tried to "fast" with Terri, but I only made it 51 hours before I broke down and had a delicious bowl of strawberries last night. Poor Terri. (Oh, and I did drink water the whole time. She has not been given that luxury in her own "fast.")


17 posted on 03/21/2005 5:50:23 AM PST by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

SCOTUS ruled, via French law, that doing this to a 16 year old cold-blooded killer, would be "cruel and unusual punishment".........but, because her legal guardian says so, Terry must die.


18 posted on 03/21/2005 5:52:14 AM PST by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
"I don't know what her wishes were, but neither do any of you," he said.

Precisely, Congressman. That is why you cannot let her die!

19 posted on 03/21/2005 5:53:02 AM PST by sonofagun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
I wonder how they would react if we withheld food & water from the prisoners at Gitmo?
20 posted on 03/21/2005 5:53:28 AM PST by rapture-me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson