It's because of his testimony in the lawsuit.
It's because of his treatment of her. Contrary to his claims of how well he treated her, the preponderance of evidence indicates he despised her, and wanted her dead quite soon after he got the lawsuit settlement.
Those witnesses, volunteered to give their affidavits, and they have absolutely nothing to gain.
Michael has money, remarrying, no time out to have to deal with Terri, or the Lawyer, or the media.
He has contradicted himself, and tried to blame everyone else for 'his problems'.
He keeps her room dark and cold, has had personal effects removed.
He doesn't want her given water by mouth as she may choke to death.
At least it would me more merciful than dehydrating and starving her to death over a likely two week period.
The Schindlers - who did not respond to a request for an interview made through their lawyer - have been distrustful of his motives partly because, they have said, no one mentioned Terri's wishes until years after her collapse. But, Scott said, "it's not something you think about while Mike's trying to save her life... . It's something that people do when there's nothing left to do."
Your quote
It's because of his treatment of her. Contrary to his claims of how well he treated her, the preponderance of evidence indicates he despised her, and wanted her dead quite soon after he got the lawsuit settlement.
Those witnesses, volunteered to give their affidavits, and they have absolutely nothing to gain.
Michael has money, remarrying, no time out to have to deal with Terri, or the Lawyer, or the media.
He has contradicted himself, and tried to blame everyone else for 'his problems'.
He keeps her room dark and cold, has had personal effects removed.
He doesn't want her given water by mouth as she may choke to death.
At least it would me more merciful than dehydrating and starving her to death over a likely two week period.
In Michaels defence and please believe me when I say I not all too comfortable taking his side but only because if he is so devoted and desirous that her wishes be carried out than he should not be unfaithful to her.
But the article says that early on he did provide very good care and theorapy. It was not until he was convinced that she was never going to recover and that she was PVS that her began to whithold care. Now if she is truely PVS then it's not like whe knows or cares so maybe in his eyes he is doing her no harm.
Now did this just coincidently happen at the same time Terri was awarded the $1 million? I don't know but if so it doesn't look good.
I still wish he would have divorced her even if he is telling the truth that he is only trying to do what Terri requested by not letting her live in a condition like this his getting a mistress kinda says to me that he's not really all too concerned about her wishes.
Then again maybe she would want him to move on with his life.
Who really knows?