To: Former Military Chick
Ahh...this wouldn't be complete without the Larry King Live Transcript from CNN!
KING: Have you had any contact with the family today? This is a sad day all the way around, Michael. We know of your dispute.
M. SCHIAVO: I've had no contact with them.
KING: No contact at all?
M. SCHIAVO: No.
KING: Do you understand how they feel?
M. SCHIAVO: Yes, I do. But this is not about them, it's about Terri. And I've also said that in court. We didn't know what Terri wanted, but this is what we want...
And that, FRiends, is called an admission of perjury.
I don't care how much this man's conscience is bothering him. Her parents are willing to be guardians...err on the side of LIFE!
41 posted on
03/20/2005 6:21:03 PM PST by
andie74
(Proud Resident of Fly-Over Country)
To: andie74
err on the side of LIFE!....
CORRECT! Been thinking the same. I can take injured plants and get them to grow. (let them root in water)
54 posted on
03/20/2005 6:26:19 PM PST by
dennisw
("What is Man that thou art mindful of him")
To: andie74
None of this makes sense to me. I don't understand why he doesn't let the parents take care of her. If, as he says, he was doing this for Terri, why can't he take comfort in knowing he did all he could do. Why such persistence to remove the feeding tube for so long when her parents want to take care of her? If this happened to me and I didn't have anything in writing, I would hope my husband would consider my parents/children's feelings, for their sake, not mine or just his.
If he divorces her, does he lose some of the settlement money in a property settlement?
I just don't understand this guy. He says one thing, but his actions say something else, at least to me.
To: andie74
I'm not on this guy's side (I find his behavior truly odd), but to be fair, I think he's paraphrasing his in-laws in that interview. I don't believe it's an "admission of perjury".
To: andie74
"And I've also said that in court. We didn't know what Terri wanted, but this is what we want..."
Wow, I never heard that one before. That's pretty freeping damning, and all those who've posted in his defense should have some interesting replies to it.
I may have to swipe that for my signature. ;)
381 posted on
03/20/2005 9:41:45 PM PST by
Darkwolf377
(Pelosi fined $21,000 for collecting/distributing funds in excess of campaign-finance laws)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson