I think that Mr. Frank's general stupidity is what is relevant, not whatever he does in his bedroom.
my point is that Frank seek to protect the courts. The courts rule, the legislature can un-do. I was just using his lifestyle cause as an example.
It is not part of this case, but is just an example part of Franks desire to have the courts decisions stand without dispute.
What is not relevant to you is Trelevant to many others. The democrats are the homosexual activist party and Franks is one if not the primary homosexual activist in congress.
You and others including myself may respect homosexuals that wish to remain chaste or at a minimum keep it in the bedroom and do not push the homosexual agenda or proclaim their homosexuality as something to be respected; however, the homosexualization of America and the homosexual activists that suggest homosexual activity is 'normal' etcetera are rightly discriminated against and rightly opposed.