To: flaglady47
Well your facts are wrong again Dear Lady.
The decision was 7 to 9. What the 5 to 4 Decision reflects is the split on what SOLUTION to impose on the Florida Court. The claim that the SC was the "Final arbiter" is completely inaccurate. The final arbiter was Al Gore who decided to abide by the SC decision rather then pursue additional legal remedies. What the SC did was direct the Fla court, 4 members of which donated money to the Gore campaign, to find an alternate solution then the Florida Court dictated solution of allowing revotes to be pursued in 3 Democrat controlled Florida counties. The SC did NOT decide the 2000 election, Al Gore did by conceding. I know facts are painful for the Hysteric Left but they don't change just because you find them emotionally uncomfortable.
2,452 posted on
03/20/2005 10:12:38 PM PST by
MNJohnnie
(Next up, US Senate. 60 in 06!)
To: MNJohnnie
"The decision was 7 to 9. " Typing too fast. You meant 7-2.
2,476 posted on
03/20/2005 10:15:56 PM PST by
cookcounty
(LooneyLibLine: "The ONLY reason for Operation Iraqi FREEDOM was WMD!!" ((repeat til brain is numb))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson