Nope. Only one person "found" that "clear and convincing" evidence.
And that law was passed "afterthe fact" of her supposed (unwitnessed) statement by the person who wants (desperately) her to be dead.
And Greer, that one man reviweing thewhole sordid case, denied other evidence fron being recorded, so it could not be reviewed by higher court.
--
Nope.
She never had due process. Review. Or therapy.
It was more than that. Read these:
http://www.sptimes.com/2003/11/08/Tampabay/Schiavo_s_wishes_reca.shtml
http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder02-00.pdf
http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/2dcaorder01-01.txt
i'm sorry for not formatting - hard to type at all.