Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: flaglady47

The judicial brach was never supposed to be superior to the other branches of giv't.


1,094 posted on 03/20/2005 8:25:18 PM PST by hoosierham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1072 | View Replies ]


To: hoosierham

"The judicial brach was never supposed to be superior to the other branches of giv't."

Then I guess no decisions will ever be final, as the executive, judicial, and legislative branches would be forever pulling the rug (decisions-wise) out from under each other at whim. There would be no final arbiter. I'll bet you liked it when the U.S. Supreme Court (the final arbiter) decided in favor of Bush (by stopping the ballot count in FL) over Gore. That was one court decision that made you happy, I'm sure. It all depends on whose ox is being gored, or whose opinion you like as versus don't like. Not a good way to run a country.


1,221 posted on 03/20/2005 8:37:22 PM PST by flaglady47 (O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1094 | View Replies ]

To: hoosierham

The judicial brach was never supposed to be superior to the other branches of giv't.

$$$$

The party of Death are using the Judicial Branch as their personal majority. They are really exposing themselves for what they are - not democratic at all!


1,321 posted on 03/20/2005 8:45:54 PM PST by maica (Ask a Dem: "When did promoting Democracy and Freedom in the World become a Bad Thing??")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1094 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson