Now Congress is one step further in meddling in peoples private affairs.
All this thing has done is solidify the pro-euthanesia side. I tell you this, if I was in her place I would pray to God that someone would put me out of my misery properly instead of starving me to death.
After all we are kind and compassionate to dogs and cats when they are in pain and can't live life anymore, we should do if for people to if that is they're choice.
The more I think about this, the more I think that the best argument is simply that the remedy is unconstitutional. It's really a form of torture, which I thinkm, the federal government has a right to prohibit. The rest of it really is a states rights issue.
Let's put you in her place. Let's say you are conscious of your surroundings as Terri demonstrated ON CAMERA, and let's say she wanted to live, but could not get that message across to anyone. Now let's put YOU in her body. How would you feel having your means of life support removed from your body, but unable to tell anyone that you want to live? Have you even seen any of the video clips taken of Terri and how she responds to her environment?
"we should do if for people to if that is they're choice."
So are you in favor of legalizing euthanasia?
(No one actually knows if Terri Schiavo wants to end her life. Only hearsay has been provided. There is no living will.)
"If that's their choice" - that's the key.
Don't starve her, eh? Just put her down?
The husband has ordered no autopsy. Find that troubling?