She may have been bulimic, she may not have been bulimic. Her teeth should be damaged if she was. OJ might have been guilty, he may not have been guilty. We can only believe the jury because otherwise all we have is the word of OJ and Nicole's family.
The most you post, the more positive I am that you know nothing of the law.
The jury is the FINDER OF FACT; and they found from the preponderance of evidence that she WAS bullimic.
BTW, the OJ analogy is a low point in your posts.