Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
You might want to get that important information to the insurance company that paid off to Schaivo so they can get their money back -- because that is EXACTLY what the jury found in that case.

She may have been bulimic, she may not have been bulimic. Her teeth should be damaged if she was. OJ might have been guilty, he may not have been guilty. We can only believe the jury because otherwise all we have is the word of OJ and Nicole's family.

626 posted on 03/20/2005 4:29:28 PM PST by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 616 | View Replies ]


To: american colleen
She may have been bulimic, she may not have been bulimic.

The most you post, the more positive I am that you know nothing of the law.

The jury is the FINDER OF FACT; and they found from the preponderance of evidence that she WAS bullimic.

BTW, the OJ analogy is a low point in your posts.

686 posted on 03/20/2005 4:46:06 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson