>And it was also after Mr. Schindler testified in open court under oath that he told Michael it was time to get on with his life.<
My goodness! So, are you implying, that by telling his son-in-law to get on with his life, Mr Schindler was saying he wanted his daughter to be killed by starvation/dehydration??
Wouldn't a simple divorce suffice just as well?
That's not what I'm implying at all.
Freepers have accused everything of MS from murder to bigomy. Although how he can be a bigamist since he's clearly still married is a mystery.
But anyway, I just thought it was interesting that previous to money being a problem with the Schindlers, they lived with and liked Michael and did not object to him being named guardian and in fact told him it was time to get on with his life.
But when they didn't get any malpractice $$ (Why they thought they were entitled to that is another mystery) is when the accusations started that Michael was not caring appropriately for their daughter and tried to strangle her.