Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kcvl

now he will be the only one allowed to see her, and he can be with her alone



"11. When Michael visited Terri, he always came alone and always had the door closed and locked while he was with Terri. He would typically be there about twenty minutes or so. When he left Terri would would be trembling, crying hysterically, and would be very pale and have cold sweats. It looked to me like Terri was having a hypoglycemic reaction, so I’d check her blood sugar. The glucometer reading would be so low it was below the range where it would register an actual number reading. I would put dextrose in Terri’s mouth to counteract it. This happened about five times on my shift as I recall. Normally Terri’s blood sugar levels were very stable due to the uniformity of her diet through tube feeding. It is my belief that Michael injected Terri with Regular insulin, which is very fast acting."

http://127.0.0.1:4664/cache?event_id=6205&schema_id=2&q=insulin&s=2506493067

post #34


28 posted on 03/20/2005 12:43:37 PM PST by kralcmot (save us all, fight for Terri's right to Life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kralcmot

If that was anyone else (especially if he was a soldier in Iraq and she was a terrorist), he'd be up on attempted murder charges.


37 posted on 03/20/2005 12:47:30 PM PST by Senormechanico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: kralcmot

and, sorry to bring this up, but, (in California and i suspect perhaps Florida), if the spouse that dies has been under doctor's care for a potentially life threatening disease or injury, no autopsy is possible unless the surviving spouse requests it.

my recollection is that Michael has already indicated that he will have her creamated when she expires.

end


61 posted on 03/20/2005 12:52:51 PM PST by kralcmot (save us all, fight for Terri's right to Life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: kralcmot
Sheesh... I trust my husband. But with so many Scott Peterson type cases out there, it doesn't make sense to me why a husband would have so many more guardianship rights than the parents ==even to the point where he can forbid the parents from seeing or helping their daughter. This is like the crap you hear coming out of India, where the husband kills his wife and then tells the parents that his wife was accidentlly "burned to death in the bath tub."

This guy obviously does not have his wife's best interests at heart. Why is it so difficult to transfer guardianship over to the parents? Also, I hear this guy has already gotten on with his life and has another woman in his life. Who is this woman? I don't understand why any woman would be attracted to a man who is so fervently battling to starve and dehydrate his wife to death.

814 posted on 03/20/2005 5:34:59 PM PST by Sally II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: kralcmot

Sounds like he was trying to finish the job.


876 posted on 03/20/2005 6:26:45 PM PST by ariamne (reformed liberal--Shieldmaiden of the Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson