Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Toddsterpatriot
So, how much tariff would be fair? And how much extra cost to steel users is okay to protect 170,000 jobs?

There's no need to micromanage the economy in that fashion, especially since excessive regulatory burdens apply to ALL domestic industries. The proper way to address the issue is to levy a relatively low (10~15%), flat-rate "revenue tariff" on ALL imported goods. And to further encourage investment in domestic production with a corresponding reduction in the corporate income tax.

The First Federal Revenue Law

On April 8, James Madison, once again a congressman from Virginia, addressed the House. He went right to the point. Congress, he said, must "remedy the evil" of "the deficiency in our Treasury." He argued that "[a] national revenue must be obtained," but not in a way "oppressive to our constituents." He then proposed that the House adopt legislation, virtually identical to the unimplemented Confederation tariff, imposing a five-percent tariff on all imports....

...A single, uniform tariff, he insisted, had two advantages. First, it could be imposed quickly, which was important because "the prospect of our harvest from the Spring importations is daily vanishing." Second, it was consistent with the principles of free trade ("commercial shackles," he said, "are generally unjust, oppressive, and impolitic")


270 posted on 03/21/2005 1:55:50 PM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]


To: Willie Green
On April 8, James Madison, once again a congressman from Virginia, addressed the House. [...]

He, he. James Madison the original Commie and evil inspirator of Patrick Buchanan.

285 posted on 03/21/2005 3:41:39 PM PST by A. Pole (The Law of Comparative Advantage: "Americans should not have children and should not go to college")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
The proper way to address the issue is to levy a relatively low (10~15%), flat-rate "revenue tariff" on ALL imported goods. And to further encourage investment in domestic production with a corresponding reduction in the corporate income tax.

And then companies would be free to import all the foreign steel they wanted?

292 posted on 03/21/2005 7:06:23 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Maybe it's not the Alinsky Method. Maybe you appear ridiculous because you are ridiculous!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson