Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Toddsterpatriot
"...but didn't the British force the sale of the grain to England..."
Not force really, certain British policies contributed, i.e. requiring farms to be divided amongst all the farmer's sons, there by creating inefficient practices. Ownership of large fields which are needed to grow cereal type crops (wheat,oats & rye) remained in 'absentee landowners' hands. Again, "ownership and profits" being controlled by foreigners lead to untold numbers of deaths by a very painful method. Keep in mind the largest beneficiary is Asia where human life is ...well you know?
So I guess that makes me more of a nationalist than capitalist. But no way would I believe that government ownership of means of production is better!!!
243 posted on 03/21/2005 12:52:05 PM PST by investigateworld (Another California Refugee in Oregon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies ]


To: investigateworld
Again, "ownership and profits" being controlled by foreigners government lead to untold numbers of deaths by a very painful method.

Not sure the cure to deadly government regulations is additional government regulations.

257 posted on 03/21/2005 1:27:20 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Maybe it's not the Alinsky Method. Maybe you appear ridiculous because you are ridiculous!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson