You didn't ask me, but I've asked myself that question a few times. My answer is always, it's one thing if she's as her "loving husband" claims AND if they can prove she actually requested to die rather than live on in this way (so far, we don't really know--her family says it's not true, her "husband" and a couple of his supporters say it is true--several years after the event and just after receiving the large monetary settlement).
But if she is as he says, and if she had actually requested death over life, then perhaps I might shut up and let it be, EXCEPT for the starving/dehydration. Anyone telling you that dying this way is not painful either doesn't know what they're talking about, or they're lying through their teeth. I find it deeply disturbing that so many people drone on and on about all the pain she's been in for all these years, and then turn around and say she won't feel any pain during this ordeal. Liars and hypocrites.
Well, we both know they'll never be able to prove that to the satisfaction of both.
But I just wondered what is going to happen if the panel agrees with what Greer has done and the USSC keeps out of it.
Is there any "authority" that will end it in that case?