Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BibChr
and bring with him the host of specialists who have said she's better off than the death squads say.

I have a question -- and I mean it sincerely.

Suppose he does that; and suppose they AGREE with the current rulings.

What then?

60 posted on 03/20/2005 8:40:25 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin
It's a good question. I honestly don't think it likely that they would. If you happen to read my blog, especially go to the link to the eye-opening article by Robert Johansen. I think that the very least they'd say is, "This woman needs to be evaluated. She hasn't even had the minimal tests indicated to diagnose this condition."

I think they'd also remark on the lack of care she's received, and say basically that it's like grading a student who hasn't even been tested yet.

That's my honest answer, hope it doesn't seem like a cop-out. If they said anything less positive than that, I'd really be surprised, and have to re-think it at that point.

Dan

74 posted on 03/20/2005 8:48:35 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson