Posted on 03/20/2005 7:51:55 AM PST by gopwinsin04
An "interested party"? He's her HUSBAND for cripes sake!
That should be enough. But in this case, there were two others she told, one of them her best friend, who both testified under oath that Terri told them the same thing she told Michael.
Now what? Do you still insist that "We don't know Terri's wishes at all"?
I'm starting to believe that talk about something fishy around how Terri ended up this way in the first place. I have to wonder why else a husband would want so badly to end his wife's life.
P.S. Being paralyzed isn't the same as being dead, jackass.
You know, this is an excellent point. Why was he awarded money for her rehabilitation IF there was no possibility she could be rehabilitated? What WAS the award based on?
Are you suggesting that the MSM would be anything other than thorough, truthful and objective? Perish the thought! < /sarcasm >
If she signed a legal living will she would have been terminated a while ago.
Just because he is her husband does not mean he has her best intereests at heart. He has been proven to be a SPOS and his credibility is shot.
According to your logic we should send back abused kids and spouses to the perpetrators.
ROFL!
That's not as clear cut as Will says it is. Because, if he has not broken the marriage contract, fidelity and all with his co-habitator and kids, then the contract must have been null and void based on her state of incapacitation. If on the other hand his infidelity did break the contract he can't be considered sole arbiter. They can't have it both ways, IMO.
Oh my God! That is really scary!
Thanks everyone for the photos!!
Any photos of Jodi?
I believe he's carrying out her wishes. That does not make him a murderer in my book.
And if you weren't blinded by your hatred of him, you'd agree.
I'll bet that Michael is plotting to find out how he can still cash in on this tragedy.
I heard he ran off the Nancy Grace show. He must have feared her questions.
His promise to take care of her forever. To provide the very best therapy, etc. I would love to hear from the jurors on that case and how they feel now about falling for that fairytale.
Actually, I understand your point quite well. You, it seems, do not understand mine. If the argument against congressional interference is based on "common law" regarding marriage, it is certainly pertinent that MS has violated the sanctity of his own marriage by taking a common law wife. according to common law, MS is "one" with his current "wife". as such, he canot also continue to be "one" with Terri
I see. But if he were a "nice guy", you'd believe him and Terri would, by now, be dead and buried.
Is that what you're saying?
Funny, I think I can see just fine. And I don't agree.
I'm not Howlin but I did read the entire editorial you cite yesterday. I'm guessing the author had a strong opinion on this issue before he wrote the piece and cherry-picked opinions that agreed with his, as he does leave out some important aspects medically. This isn't to say he's right or wrong, just that anyone taking this editorial as gospel is probably doing themselves a disservice.
She was unconscious from oxygen deprivation. She couldn't "sign" anything.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.