Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cold Heat

It's not a blatant falsehood. I didn't say she didn't have any tests at all. I said that she didn't have an MRI or PRT, and that's according to National Review Online. NRO is reporting that she never received an MRI or PRT (if that's what it's called). Go to the website and present what you know in direct opposition to what they are reporting and maybe you can get them to retract what was posted. But, in the meantime, while I have nothing against you personally, I believe them before I believe you.


425 posted on 03/19/2005 1:01:38 PM PST by AlbionGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies ]


To: AlbionGirl
First and foremost, there is anecdotal and reporting evidence of a MRI or more being done.

But that is not really that important, as CT scans are the preferred test for brain and organ pictures. Not MRI's.

We know that these have been done as well.This is another lie to cause public reaction by the family.

This time they told it to officers of the court,(lawyers) and congress. Not just the news media.

Their freedom to lie will be coming to an end soon. If there is real justice in this country still.

493 posted on 03/19/2005 1:15:10 PM PST by Cold Heat (This space is being paid not to do anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson