[AlbionGirl]

You're right about that. What kind of woman gets knocked up by a man whose wife is in this condition? And isn't it amazing to watch people defend this on the grounds that his wife isn't really alive, implying the marriage contract loses it's teeth based on her incapacited condition rendering his co-habitation and child producing justified, but then turn around and argue for her death based on the viability and sacrosanct nature of the marriage contract?

[TXBubba]

And isn't it amazing to watch people defend this on the grounds that his wife isn't really alive, implying the marriage contract loses it's teeth based on her incapacited condition rendering his co-habitation and child producing justified, but then turn around and argue for her death based on the viability and sacrosanct nature of the marriage contract?

Good point! Worth a repeat post.

[kalee]

"And isn't it amazing to watch people defend this on the grounds that his wife isn't really alive, implying the marriage contract loses it's teeth based on her incapacited condition rendering his co-habitation and child producing justified, but then turn around and argue for her death based on the viability and sacrosanct nature of the marriage contract?"

Marriage like the Constitution is a living breathing changing document and says what they want it to say when they want it to say it. sarcasm/off

As for what kind of woman has children with a man whose wife is in this condition, a very stupid one. If he caused Terri's condition, she is just a fight away from where Terri is, but maybe the money MS has made off Terri calms her fears and blunts her suspicians.

[Petronski]

AlbionGirl, that's brilliant.

[mafree]

...isn't it amazing to watch people defend this on the grounds that his wife isn't really alive, implying the marriage contract loses it's teeth based on her incapacited condition rendering his co-habitation and child producing justified, but then turn around and argue for her death based on the viability and sacrosanct nature of the marriage contract?

AMEN!! Best question on this thread!

[BykrBayb]

This is an excellent point, that bears repeating. Mafree, thanks for mentioning it later in the thread, or I would have missed it.

And isn't it amazing to watch people defend this on the grounds that his wife isn't really alive, implying the marriage contract loses it's teeth based on her incapacited condition rendering his co-habitation and child producing justified, but then turn around and argue for her death based on the viability and sacrosanct nature of the marriage contract?