To: AlbionGirl; mafree; BykrBayb
And I'm going to BUMP Albion Girl's observant words again, as they are absolutely oozing with irony and screaming with salience:
"And isn't it amazing to watch people defend this on the grounds that his wife isn't really alive, implying the marriage contract loses it's teeth based on her incapacited condition rendering his co-habitation and child producing justified, but then turn around and argue for her death based on the viability and sacrosanct nature of the marriage contract?"
1,577 posted on
03/19/2005 11:41:57 PM PST by
Miss Behave
(Man who fart in church sit in own pew.)
To: Miss Behave; AlbionGirl; Petronski; William Terrell
This is an excellent observation, AlbionGirl! very succinct:
>"...isn't it amazing to watch people defend this on the grounds that his wife isn't really alive, implying the marriage contract loses it's teeth based on her incapacitated condition rendering his co-habitation and child producing justified, but then turn around and argue for her death based on the viability and sacrosanct nature of the marriage contract?"<
1,588 posted on
03/19/2005 11:50:56 PM PST by
FBD
("A nation without borders is not a nation." -- Ronald Reagan)
To: Miss Behave
"And isn't it amazing to watch people defend this on the grounds that his wife isn't really alive, implying the marriage contract loses it's teeth based on her incapacited condition rendering his co-habitation and child producing justified, but then turn around and argue for her death based on the viability and sacrosanct nature of the marriage contract?"
AMEN!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson