To: Cold Heat
"He met all the requirements to allow this and order it to occur.
Any first hand reading by a beginner law student can see that."
There you go, ignoring the Constitution and relying on case law, precedence, which becomes the rule of law.
"No law was made by this or any other judge on this particular case."
Really, where in the Constitution is there authority that one judge can give a death sentence with out that person being tried.
"I agree that it happens a lot, but it did not happen here."
This case happened because of previous case law which does set a precedence.
"What happened is a public reaction caused by intent to incite."
So is this what had you upset, have you been incited?
"I will not get into it further.I am on my way to bed."
Goodnight.
"But, it must be said that the way to address this is thought the legislature for future cases! Not by trying to subvert Justice, whether you agree with it or not."
Well I am not comfortable using one human being as the method of perverting the system established by the Constitution.
"What is happening is just plain wrong."
You got that right.
To: Just mythoughts
Lookie....if you won't take the time to read the damn law then don't post. It is all drivel!
1,538 posted on
03/19/2005 10:58:06 PM PST by
Cold Heat
(This space is being paid not to do anything.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson