It was.
This is best layed out in the court summaries.
I guess you failed to read them.
oh, that is right, the judge, the witnesses and all that are evil members of the culture of death!
Aaaaaaaack!
I am out of here for the night. I will get back into the fray tomorrow.
Uh, I think you're confusing opinions with facts. Court summaries are opinions. Evidence presented to the court are facts. Michael's testimony that he wanted to become a nurse in order to keep his promise to her that he would care for her the rest of his life, conflicts with his later testimony. How can you consider his earlier testimony to be clear and convincing, and still consider his later testimony to be clear and convincing? They are clearly conflicting.
Assertions are just that, assertions. Show me.