I know, even Lis Wiehl (sp) on Fox disagreed--and Catherine Crier was VERY against it, but I am not as surprised with her, since she was once a judge--
What did surprise me though, was a CIVIL RIGHTS LAWYER that was on Rita Cosbys show, and HE was against it--
I thought that was what the congress is trying to do--get Terri's case before a Federal court to preserve her civil right to not be starved to death--you know the Constitution, LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, stuff?
Of course, most of Crier and Weihl's objection is that it is for this one particular woman--I think
They're all part of the judicial racket, so they cringe at the idea of the people taking back power from the judiciary.
Crier was once part of the TX Republican establishment. Those lawyers and judges do stick together, don't they, like a cabal of conspirators. It seems that many are not very trustworthy. Even the appointees of Reagan and Jeb Bush have been disloyal to what those two men thought they were getting on the bench.
It's hard to believe that Crier (and I never watch her) does not know the details of the Schiavo case, but she may be ignorant of the facts. She may not even know that MRS has been an adulterer for at least eleven years.