Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Earthdweller
Hmmmmmmm.....

Still..I refer to that smile as my evidence of her will to live.

I gave up trying to discern things from smiles a long time ago. They mean nothing if a baby does in the womb or if a dog smiles. In her case, it is a natural facial expression IMO. She is certainly not expressing happiness, but that is why the Shindlers put that film together for. They wanted to manipulate public opinion, and they have. It just did not work on me.

I saw a head smiling in 1971.

It had no body attached to it. You learn things as life progresses. Some of the things are not very rosy.

I could give the smile some weight in the argument, if I believed she had any metal acuity to know if she were happy or not.

I see no evidence of that, and neither did the court. I think the anecdotal stuff is hyperbole.

1,291 posted on 03/19/2005 7:24:01 PM PST by Cold Heat (This space is being paid not to do anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1289 | View Replies ]


To: Cold Heat
"....She is certainly not expressing happiness..."

I you know this because??? What? Because you would not be happy in her circumstance?

You are projecting your own feelings..not being objective.

Have you seen a baby aborted in the womb? There is a picture of a very interesting "natural" facial expression on silent scream.com you might be interested in.

Let me know what your projected feelings are to the fetus after you see that clip.

1,306 posted on 03/19/2005 7:36:03 PM PST by Earthdweller (US descendant of French Protestants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1291 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson