Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach
Some freepers have said that only Michael was told about Terri's comments that she never wanted to be kept alive with machines and tubes. Yet court testimony indicates her best friend, Joan, also heard Terri say that.

Do you have a link?

50 posted on 03/19/2005 10:36:52 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (Life support. canned, frozen or fresh, it's good for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: DJ MacWoW

The Orlando Sentinel article on which we're all commenting has a link at the end of the article.

It was working when this article was previously posted (twice, as I recall, in both February and March).

I tried to get on it again this morning and it's not working.

However, there are other articles that re-state the court testimony. Also, a google search will give you the court testimony.


56 posted on 03/19/2005 10:38:22 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: DJ MacWoW
Was Michael the only person who testified about Terri's supposed statements on her views about living on life support?

No, others did as well, and when making the decision in the case, the trial judge took into account all of that testimony and additional evidence. As the Second District explained:

We note that the guardianship court's original order expressly relied upon and found credible the testimony of witnesses other than Mr. Schiavo or the Schindlers. We recognize that Mrs. Schiavo's earlier oral statements were important evidence when deciding whether she would choose in February 2000 to withdraw life-prolonging procedures. See § 765.401(3), Fla. Stat. (2000); In re Guardianship of Browning, 568 So. 2d 4, 16. Nevertheless, the trial judge, acting as her proxy, also properly considered evidence of Mrs. Schiavo's values, personality, and her own decision-making process.

63 posted on 03/19/2005 10:44:16 AM PST by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: DJ MacWoW

Some freepers have said that only Michael was told about Terri's comments that she never wanted to be kept alive with machines and tubes. Yet court testimony indicates her best friend, Joan, also heard Terri say that.

Do you have a link?



Joan, who is also Michael's brother's wife. They allowed Michael's side of the family's testimony, but no one else's.


164 posted on 03/19/2005 11:30:19 AM PST by jdhljc169
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: DJ MacWoW

"she never wanted to be kept alive with machines and tubes. Yet court testimony indicates her best friend, Joan, also heard Terri say that.
Do you have a link?"

The actual testimony isn't here but in the summation there is a reference to an "expert witness" who says the comments of her friends is consistent with kids Terri's age. Apparrently there were several who testified she didn't want to be hooked to a machine, burden on society etc. from what I read.

http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder02-00.pdf

The actual trial was May 1998… Michael files petition for court to determine whether Terri's feeding tube should be removed; Michael takes position that Terri would chose to remove the tube; Terri's parents take position that Terri would chose not to remove the tube.

Pehaps you can find the transcripts?


587 posted on 03/19/2005 4:51:49 PM PST by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson