Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Frist Threatens Jail for Terri Judge(Shiavo Feeding)
Newsmax ^ | 3/19/05

Posted on 03/19/2005 8:00:19 AM PST by beyond the sea

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist said Friday that subpoenas issued by Sen. Mike Enzi compelling Terri Schiavo to appear at a March 28 congressional hearing made it a crime to disconnect her feeding tube - and threatened anyone who interfered with her testimony with jail.

In a statement issued by the majority leader's office, Frist said:

"Federal criminal law protects witnesses called before official Congressional committee proceedings from anyone who may obstruct or impede a witness’ attendance or testimony."

"More specifically," said the Senate's top Republican, "the law protects a witness from anyone who - by threats, force, or by any threatening letter or communication - influences, obstructs, or impedes an inquiry or investigation by Congress.

"Anyone who violates this law is subject to criminal fines and imprisonment," Frist said.

His comments appeared to be directed at Florida state judge George Greer, who brazenly defied the Enzi subpoena on Friday and ordered Schiavo's starvation to commence.

Frist's statement echoed comments by House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, who said late Friday that he intended to charge Greer with contempt of Congress.

"No little judge sitting in a state district court in Florida is going to usurp the authority of Congress," he complained.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; death; feeding; frist; mikeenzi; schiavo; shiavo; subpoenas; terri; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 341-348 next last
To: Enterprise

So what's your point?

One is a criminal and the other is not.

I don't see a conflict here at all.


101 posted on 03/19/2005 8:36:37 AM PST by Bigh4u2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea
Memo to Doc Frist from "Judge" Greer:

Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges.

I urinate on the law, the Constitution of the State of Florida, the United States Constitution, and basic human morality. Not satisfied with this, I just also defecated on your Congressional supoenas.

I am a proud judicial tyrant, and I have stolen your stinking democracy.

102 posted on 03/19/2005 8:37:46 AM PST by FormerACLUmember (Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robe

" I've told my wife the same thing.. no tubes...and it's not written down anywhere.."

It is now!


103 posted on 03/19/2005 8:37:57 AM PST by Bigh4u2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

This case is real simple to me. If Terri wanted to die, she should have put it in writting or at least told someone other than her husband.

Now we are being asked to believe the one person who really wants her dead to accept that these are her wishes. I have a hard time doing that.


104 posted on 03/19/2005 8:38:17 AM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

Comment #105 Removed by Moderator

To: dcuddeback
Someone has got to clean house before it explodes into a civil war. Don't laugh. We ARE on the way.

As much as a great deal of right-minded civil disobedience would be great in the future for the right reasons ---- forget about it! There will NEVER be anything even like the incorrect anti-war protests in the late 60's and early 70's. People are just sluggish, lazy, and uninspired slobs. It WILL NEVER HAPPEN!

NEVER!

Your dreams of civil war are indeed a DREAM!

*****

There was barely a peep when Congress passed the unconstitutional 'Campaign Finance Reform' crap. Forget about it.

The great majority of the citizens are asleep or just plain ignorant and disinterested.

The big plan is working.

106 posted on 03/19/2005 8:38:50 AM PST by beyond the sea (Colonial Script........... or nationalize The Federal Bank..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Samurai_Jack
Yes, Just an empty threat.

Lots of hot air blowing and no action!

Meanwhile Terri slowly dies.

107 posted on 03/19/2005 8:39:49 AM PST by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea
"If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare, and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare, they may take the care of religion into their own hands; they may appoint teachers in every State, county and parish and pay them out of their public treasury; they may take into their own hands the education of children, establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union; they may assume the provision of the poor; they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post-roads; in short, every thing, from the highest object of state legislation down to the most minute object of police, would be thrown under the power of Congress. ...

Were the power of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for, it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature of the limited Government established by the people of America."

—James Madison

108 posted on 03/19/2005 8:40:59 AM PST by G.Mason (The pacifist is as surely a traitor to his country and to humanity as is the most brutal wrongdoer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dwilli
Federal law also prevents the congress from usurping state's rights for political purposes.

That didn't stop President Eisenhower from sending the National Guard in to protect black children from entering a school in Little Rock.

And I seem to remember federal institutions intruding on "states rights" a few other times too. Like when the Supreme Court overturned all state abortion laws in Roe v. Wade. And later, overturned all state death penalty laws (though SCOTUS reversed itself on that.) And, more recently, all states' sodomy laws in Lawrence v. Texas.

109 posted on 03/19/2005 8:41:51 AM PST by shhrubbery!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
Were the power of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for, it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature of the limited Government established by the people of America."

-----------

Yep. I just posted the article for discussion.

;-)

110 posted on 03/19/2005 8:43:47 AM PST by beyond the sea (Colonial Script........... or nationalize The Federal Bank..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Samurai_Jack
Agree, empty threat, and this is nothing more than a late term abortion.

No longer needed or wanted unviable tissue mass.

111 posted on 03/19/2005 8:43:47 AM PST by dts32041 (When did the Democratic party stop being the political arm of the KKK?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
"LOL! I'd like to see Judge Greer be tarred, feathered and then burned at the stake."

Sadly, that will never happen.

However, maybe some jail time on BREAD and WATER is a possibility!!!

Any Legals out there with an opinion?

112 posted on 03/19/2005 8:44:00 AM PST by Dacus943
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: floriduh voter
"Terri was asked "do you want to live" and Terri twice said "yeah". "

How many people were witness to this? What about now, is she morphined up?

113 posted on 03/19/2005 8:44:55 AM PST by oprahstheantichrist (Terri's battle is NOT against flesh and blood....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2
How is the judge on the right side of the law? By appointing HIMSELF as guardian of Terri Shiavo

It is against FL state law for any judge to be the guardian of someone whose case he is involved in!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

114 posted on 03/19/2005 8:46:07 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea
"No little judge sitting in a state district court in Florida is going to usurp the authority of Congress," he complained.

Guess what? That little judge just did. The judge did his thing, will you do yours???

115 posted on 03/19/2005 8:46:33 AM PST by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparticus
Please stop picking on the US Marshals. My husband is a Marshal, so I hear first hand, how much contempt the Marshals feel for some of the judges they are sworn to protect.

The judges abuse the Marshals, use them as chauffeurs and errand boys, and often ignore Marshals' recommendations to keep prisoners in handcuffs when they appear before Federal Judges. The judges often show little regard for the judgment of the Marshals, who know the behavior of the violent offenders whom they have tracked and apprehended much better than the judges do.

The Marshals also have a significantly higher rate of actually finding their suspects than the FBI - they are the unsung heros of the law enforcement world. The FBI usually takes credit for the finds the Marshals have made - a good example is the DC sniper case. FBI took credit, but a US Marshal who spent four sleepless nights on a computer actually tracked a vehicle down that everyone else had ignored and was able to issue the BOLO which lead to the snipers' apprehensions.

INS agent seized Elian Gonzales.

116 posted on 03/19/2005 8:46:33 AM PST by DarthTinkerbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

The penumbra of the constitution says Pres. Bush has the right to send federal marshals down there to save her. It is time we enforce the penumbra of the constitution.


117 posted on 03/19/2005 8:46:34 AM PST by FreedomSurge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparticus
Strange that the judge has never bothered to see go this girl.

He hasn't because he's legally blind. He can barely see the shape of the hand in front of his face

How, then, can he assess the credibility of witnesses before him?

118 posted on 03/19/2005 8:49:17 AM PST by vanagoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: westmichman

First, the concept of "rights" is based on individual rights. No one has rights, unless everyone has them. Second, imagine those who say that handicapped can be killed because they don't have quality of life deciding that they want to save money by testing all of the nursing home residents in the U.S. and withholding food and water from those who do not pass the test. If we were talking about millions of people starving this weekend rather than just one, would you conceed that the situation was political? With a lot of talk about tackling the expenses of Medicare and Medicaid next, we are closer to having a discussion of these ideas than you may imagine. Remember, the French just let 15,000 elderly dies while they went on vacation a couple of years ago.


119 posted on 03/19/2005 8:50:09 AM PST by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: dwilli
Excuse me, but while the husband's attorney tries to frame the issue in terms of political power, too, there is a human life at stake, and there are unalienable rights which are being abrogated by a State judge. And those are a tad more important than any supposed political scorecard.
120 posted on 03/19/2005 8:50:33 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 341-348 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson