Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sweetliberty
No way is that kind of behavior appropriate in any setting or for any reason, unless the child was literally defending her life.

I used the words "relatively normal," not "appropriate. It has been known for millenia that 5 year olds tend to act inappropriately.

As for my statement "One could think up quite a few scenerios where the girl might have been responding in a relatively normal - albeit assertive - way":

Those 5 year olds who cannot be baited into either becoming insular and non-responsive, or hysterical are few and far between.

There is a reason that the Biblical instruction for children to obey their parents is side-by-side with the command for parents not to exasperate their children.

Letting a 5-year old have candy and then taking it away can reasonably be expected to result in a confrontation if not done carefully and with deliberation. ...not every child will, but hardly a rare occurrence.

90 posted on 03/19/2005 3:12:21 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: lepton
Letting a 5-year old have candy and then taking it away can reasonably be expected to result in a confrontation if not done carefully and with deliberation. ...not every child will, but hardly a rare occurrence.

Absolute garbage. A five year old with a normal upbringing would never react the way this child did to that.

91 posted on 03/19/2005 3:14:31 PM PST by ShadowDancer (As for the types of comments I make,sometimes I just, By God,get carried away with my own eloquence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson