[ContraryMary]

It's not about "a decision we don't like", although we don't, it's about refusing to hear testimony on her behalf, it's about refusing to allow adequate unbiased medical tests, it's about connections with a sherrif who refused to investigate allegations of abuse, it's about a decision that is contrary to a specific provision of the State Constitution and now it's about defiance of a legal and binding federal subpoena.

All the testimony has been heard, all the unbiased medical tests have been done. How many times does the same evidence have to be presented? All the issues raised have been considered by the courts at least once. And the decision was made in accordance with the laws of the state of Florida. Lastly, the Congressional subpoena was not legal. Again, I say that simply because we don't like the decision does not mean the courts did not do their job.

[TigersEye]

All the testimony has been heard, that was allowed to be heard

all the unbiased medical tests have been done. that were allowed to be done

How many times does the same evidence have to be presented? How many times can a judge refuse to hear evidence?

All the issues raised have been considered by the courts court just one court and one judge

at least once. And the decision was made in accordance with the laws of the state of Florida. Flatly, not true.

Lastly, the Congressional subpoena was not legal. Care to point out how it was illegal?

[PajamaTruthMafia]

You need to take the time to check your facts. Why don't you start here:

http://www.terrisfight.org/

[Petronski]

How many times does the same evidence have to be presented?

How about some DIFFERENT evidence, like an MRI?