To: Trinity_Tx
The appeals court also reviewed the videos in total....bottom line, there is no there there.
38 posted on
03/18/2005 11:38:02 PM PST by
Drango
(All my ideas, good or bad, are stolen from other FReepers)
To: Drango
No. They said there was indication in the videos that she could respond and did but because she couldn't do it consistently, they ruled PVS. Good grief this woman is brain damaged, hello? If she could "consistently" respond everytime she wouldn't have brain damage, would she? Has anyone's BRAINS ever concluded that she is responding vaguely and only occasionally because that is all she can do? DUHHHHHH
91 posted on
03/19/2005 5:55:14 AM PST by
greccogirl
("Freedom belongs to those who are willing to sacrifice the most for it")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson