Posted on 03/18/2005 4:57:44 PM PST by truth49
Contrary to the belief of some state officials, the voter approved I-601 spending limit is still in effect. This has ramifications on the budget proposal Governor Christine Gregoire will release on Monday, March 21, at 10 a.m. Based on the $25,721 million forecasted revenue for the 2005-07 budget (includes $836 million 2003-05 ending-fund balance) and the $25,107 million voter approved I-601 spending limit law, Gregoire's budget proposal will fall into one of the four following scenarios:
1) Gregoire's budget will be balanced within forecasted revenue and the state's I-601 spending limit. This will mean that NO tax increase of any kind will be needed (this is the only scenario that follows the priorities of government budget process—focusing on program results);
2) Gregoire's budget will include requests for new taxes and expenditures that exceed the state's I-601 spending limit. Under current law this will require a vote of the people at the November election to approve expenditures and taxes in excess of the I-601 spending limit;
3) Gregoire's budget will include requests for new taxes and expenditures that exceed the state's I-601 spending limit. Rather than refer these actions to a vote of the people as law requires, state officials will eliminate the I-601 voter approved spending limit. Current law requires a vote of the people for approval of expenditures and taxes in excess of the I-601 spending limit; or
4) Lawmakers will pass a 2005 supplemental budget that spends the majority of the projected 2003-05 $836 million ending-fund balance. This action will greatly expand the I-601 spending limit and taxes will be raised to bridge the gap between the $24,885 million forecasted revenue and the new I-601 limit.
I-601 expenditure limit
(All dollars in millions)
| 2005-07 I-601 limit | $25,107 |
| 2005-07 forecasted revenue | $24,885 |
| 2003-05 ending fund balance | $836 |
| Total 2005-07 resources | $25,721 |
| I-601 2005-07 budget reserve | $614 |
RCW 43.135.035
Tax legislation—Conditions and restrictions—Ballot title—Declarations of emergency—Taxes on intangible property—Expenditure limit to reflect program cost shifting or fund transfer.
(1) After July 1, 1995, any action or combination of actions by the legislature that raises state revenue or requires revenue-neutral tax shifts may be taken only if approved by a two-thirds vote of each house, and then only if state expenditures in any fiscal year, including the new revenue, will not exceed the state expenditure limits established under this chapter.(2)(a) If the legislative action under subsection (1) of this section will result in expenditures in excess of the state expenditure limit, then the action of the legislature shall not take effect until approved by a vote of the people at a November general election. The office of financial management shall adjust the state expenditure limit by the amount of additional revenue approved by the voters under this section. This adjustment shall not exceed the amount of revenue generated by the legislative action during the first full fiscal year in which it is in effect. The state expenditure limit shall be adjusted downward upon expiration or repeal of the legislative action.
(b) The ballot title for any vote of the people required under this section shall be substantially as follows:
"Shall taxes be imposed on . . . . . . . in order to allow a spending increase above last year's authorized spending adjusted for inflation and population increases?"
No but who cares. The people in WA have the government they want.
And these people are considered heroes because they got there in a Conestoga wagon!
Joke!
"Has the fact that Gregoire along with her Democratic pals stole this election even being investigated!"
Yes. See past threads on this subject. The court is is the discovery phase as we speak.
"No but who cares. The people in WA have the government they want."
This is completely untrue. The GOP candidate for governor, Dino Rossi, originally won the election. He still won after the first recount, but lost by a mere handful of votes on the second hand recount. Dino Rossi, the Republican, won the election two times in spite of the very liberal west side of the state. WE in Washington most certainly did not get what we want.
I am sorry but my count was Rossi 3, Gregoire 1 and she is now in charge.
No, we don't, but we also don't have Boxer (8^)
What does it matter that the voters approved it? Just find a judge somewhere to overturn it, and start hiking those taxes!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.