Balogna. Her parents and friends have shown she was a practicing Catholic. That goes toward her views on removing food and water from disabled persons.
I don't know whether Terri is aware or not. If you listen to the Terri crowd, she's a talking encyclopedia. If you talk to the other side, she's brain dead. Snippets of movies don't mean jack. Anybody can edit anything today to portray anything they want.
What you have just described is reasonable doubt which should accrue toward the side of life. Very simple.
And if you don't trust your spouse to make decisions for you when you can't, you either shouldn't have married him, or you should have set your wishes out where other people could look at them and decide.
This is ridiculous. Doesn't deserve comment.
I think Terri deserves another examination and a determination based on that, but I deeply resent Congress telling me that my wife didn't say what she said unless I can somehow prove it.
Yeah, well if you had another gal, two kids by that gal and a million dollar trust fund waiting for you if your wife was starved to death, I would hope somebody wouldn't take you at your word.
Does anyone know how much money is left? And who is paying her extra bills from hospice.
What nobody has pointed out is that as soon as she goes a day or two and starts to look distressed, the usual course of action from hospice is to sedate her with morphine or tranquilizers. I have seen hospice do this with terminal cancer patients. It hastens death by suppressing respiration and usually the person goes from a respiratory ailment. It happens very very quickly. It looks like relief of suffering but it is really euthanasia. And relatives do not complain. they do not want to see the people they care about suffer.
I'm just going to chalk your replies on this thread to Friday night and see if things improve later. You're out of character, and before I rip you a new one, I'm going to let it rest.