[Servant of the 9]

You are dancing all around the key issue here: No one knows WHAT Terrri wants! So how about we let her live and give her therapy so perhaps she can someday tell us?

It really is the pits when people inconvenience us, isn't it?

I don't know what you think this is about.
You seem to want to make it about feelings.
Well, I seem to have missed the Bambi Movie, and Old Yeller too.

This is about the law we will all have to live under for years to come and how it is being screwed up to the detriment of thousands in order to save a 'person' who did absolutely nothing to save herself when she could have.

Yes, she is inconvenient, and she is inconvenient through her own negligence, so let her die.

So9

[The Red Zone]

who did absolutely nothing to save herself when she could have

Such as planning a divorce but only a little too late?

[Shortstop7]

Yes, she is inconvenient, and she is inconvenient through her own negligence, so let her die. So9

I cannot believe you just posted that. You should be removed from this board immediately. You disgust me.

[Americanchild]

Your arrogance is wearing thin. Ditto your blind adherance to a law whatever the cost. The rightness or wrongness of an issue seem to be lost on you.

In any case, my arguments have been clear and not based on feelings. Accepting laws based on death is contrary to human nature. It's as simple as that. Furthermore I fail to see why a change in the laws frightens you so, when it would not affect those with explicit wishes.

Your inability to admit to the personhood of Terri shows your true beliefs, and your dissertation on her inconvenience is most disturbing.Her fault?? How many young newlyweds think about a living will, for pete's sake? Did you?