[supercat]

Yes, I've viewed all the videos, but I've also read the reports submitted to the court. I just don't know. To his credit, Michael hasn't offered videos of Terri NOT responding to stimuli, but he could. I have no doubt that my wife could shoot video which "proved" I was dead.

Which side has expressed more interest in letting real evidence of Terri's real present situation reach disinterested persons?

If Michael wanted to show the world that Terri was PVS (assuming she actually is, which I doubt) he could let the parents take a blood sample and video her, with Michael running a silultaneous video. The parents could then confirm that Terri was not sedated, and would have video that would either support their case or not. If the parents tried to take video clips out of context, Michael could pulicly show them in context.

There are many other things Michael could do if he wanted to show Terri was PVS, if she actually is. His refusal to do any of them suggests pretty strongly to me that he believes people might decide she's not PVS and that he's a liar.

[Dog Gone]

I'd favor something like that, and I expect it will happen. Perhaps not the competing video tapes, but a new evaluation by someone not previously connected to the case.

Congress isn't going to accept Judge Greer's decision at this point, even though they may ultimately have to.