Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DeLay Pledges Contempt Charge for Terri Judge
NewsMax ^ | 3/18/05 | Limbacher

Posted on 03/18/2005 4:32:07 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

House Majority Leader Tom DeLay pledged Friday to hold Florida state judge George Greer in contempt of Congress for ignoring a congressional subpoena for Terri Schiavo's testimony, saying, "No little judge sitting in a state district court in Florida is going to usurp the authority of Congress."

"The Congress will pursue this, if we have to hold him in contempt of Congress," DeLay told radio host Sean Hannity.

Pressed on whether he intended to hold Judge Greer in contempt, the top Republican told Hannity: "Absolutely, absolutely."

"We will do everything to enforce the power and authority of the Congress and no little judge sitting in a state district court in Florida is going to usurp the authority of Congress," he added.

Earlier in the day Judge Greer rebuffed the Schiavo subpoena, telling attorneys in the case, "I have had no cogent reason why the [congressional] committee should intervene." He claimed that the last-minute action on the part of Congress does not nullify years of legal proceedings.

But DeLay told Hannity, "This judge and the Supreme Court of Florida are well known to be liberal judges that have a different worldview and they're imposing their worldview on the law."

The top House leader said that "no sane person" could look at Schiavo and say she's in a persistent vegetative state.

DeLay called a lawyer for Michael Schiavo, who has pressed for years to have his wife starved to death, "the personification of evil."


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chooselife; contempt; cultureofdeath; delay; eugenics; impeachgreer; judge; judgegreer; parentsrights; schiavo; terri; terrischiavo; terrischindler; tomdelay; weloveyouterri
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 1,081-1,093 next last
To: beandog
No one on this site had to withdraw food and water from anyone, they chose to. The same with the anchors on Fox news.

If you don't think it is a matter of "had to" then you have never done it to a loved one. It is unimiginably hard. I had given my father my word many times that I would do it when the time came, and I kept faith with him. It wasn't something I chose to do.

So9

661 posted on 03/18/2005 7:46:09 PM PST by Servant of the 9 (Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 621 | View Replies]

To: beandog

I don't think withholding food and water happens commonly as the guy upthread says. I have consulted in nursing homes and hospitals for thirty years and have never seen it done. I have seen feeding tubes not inserted at the request of families of people with severe dementias and no hope of recovery but never have I seen food and water withheld. Even with no feediing tube they use hyperalimentation via IV and they give sips of water. I have never ever seen anyone starved to death.

If the purpose is to kill her, why do they not go all the way and give her a lethal injection. That is the intent so why not do it? The very same people don't want to give lethal injections with death penalty. But they will starve a woman. No human deserves that.


662 posted on 03/18/2005 7:46:18 PM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 621 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9

Your circles travel prepared, eh?!


663 posted on 03/18/2005 7:46:25 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

Uh, I think I have... and I agree with the judges who have agreed that she should be allowed to die. Just because I do not agree with you does not mean I am "uninformed". Thanks


664 posted on 03/18/2005 7:46:41 PM PST by Blast_Master
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 604 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
You are an anti-Protestant bigot and you even betray your own Catholic religion in this case to bash the "Christian Right" that you hate.

I have nothing against decent Protestants who mind their manners.

I think you've had one too many Falstaffs, Joe. Nobody, anywhere, has said anything about the "Christian Right."

665 posted on 03/18/2005 7:46:46 PM PST by sinkspur ("Preach the gospel. If necessary, use words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 617 | View Replies]

To: jaime1959
"So much for State's rights. Didn't conservatives used to believe in those?"

I Make exceptions and THIS SITUATION is one of those exceptions. This judge and Florida Supreme Court if abusing the LEGAL SYTEM.

All I can say about Florida is if you are old and not in great health - DON'T live there. It is a death factory. Look at how they "care" for old people - they sedate them and starve them like Terri.
666 posted on 03/18/2005 7:46:48 PM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 651 | View Replies]

To: Blast_Master

"And ask yourself one thing, I know if my wife had expressed a desire not to be artificially kept alive, I would do everything I could to try to fulfill her wishes... even if they were not written down."

~~~~~~

Hey, Blast_Master, take a look at the following, a statement from a girlfriend of the estranged husband:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Regarding that alleged conversation [that Terri supposedly said she would want to die in such a situation] -- Cindy Shook said that Michael Schiavo said:

"How the hell should I know, we never spoke about this, we were young."

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:yzE5tNjKsYMJ:ottawa.indymedia.org/en/2005/02/628.shtml+schiavo+how+the+hell+should+i+know&hl=en


667 posted on 03/18/2005 7:47:18 PM PST by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Your statistics are still in error. The other cases you cite do not have the same characteristics as this case.

The only difference was there was no court fight. With the new law the House passed, many will end up in contested cases.

SO9

668 posted on 03/18/2005 7:47:47 PM PST by Servant of the 9 (Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 628 | View Replies]

To: jaime1959

The Supreme Court gutted states' rights in a 1941 decision, saying that states have independent powers under the Tenth Amendment but that such powers are not greater than those of the central government. Let's face it: we are a big government country, and states' rights are out! For some reason though, liberals love states' rights in THIS case!


669 posted on 03/18/2005 7:47:50 PM PST by Theodore R. (Terri has already outlived Eleanor Centzone, but time is running out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 651 | View Replies]

To: jaime1959

Terri has civil rights......civil rights cases are decided at the federal level. Always have.


670 posted on 03/18/2005 7:48:11 PM PST by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 651 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
Have they convinced themselves that by withholding nutrition they are not playing an active role in her death? Isn't that a bit delusional?

BINGO.

The death camps in Germany were set up so that most of the people weren't killed by anyone in particular. Someone marched the people into the "showers", someone else dropped gas into them without having seen anyone go in (so they wouldn't have to think about the people in there). Someone else took the dead bodies out (so the people marching the victims in never would never see what happened to them).

671 posted on 03/18/2005 7:48:20 PM PST by supercat ("Though her life has been sold for corrupt men's gold, she refuses to give up the ghost.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies]

To: jaime1959

THe Constitution forgot to include the phrase "the states have the right to kill innocent people".


672 posted on 03/18/2005 7:48:21 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 651 | View Replies]

To: HoustonCurmudgeon

Does he want fries with that?


673 posted on 03/18/2005 7:48:33 PM PST by Les_Miserables
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Take the beam out of your own eye, Pharisee. Aren't you glad you're not like the rest of men?

No, you are the Pharisee, arguing for the death of a woman that does not deserve it so that the letter of the law maybe fulfilled.

But it is all pretense on your part anyway as you are trying to promote a culture of death, not the law.

You merely hide behind the law to see the death you long for.

And I am glad to not be a pondscum like you, and look forward to Gods Judgement Day when all will be made Just.

674 posted on 03/18/2005 7:48:35 PM PST by JFK_Lib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Sink has a certain lack of sympathy to some actions of certain fundmantalist Protestants as it pertains to the public square. So do I. That does not make him an anti-Protestant bigot; that is a smear. That just means he disagrees with some of them on some political matters. And this WASP agrees with him sometimes on such matters, including the matter of Judge Moore, who was rightly bounced, although I am near atheist, so I don't count.


675 posted on 03/18/2005 7:48:43 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 658 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9
I see a conflict if all that is true, but I wasn't there, the Judge was, and he was upheld on appeal.

Now I feel quite comfortable in saying that you are being less than honest.

There is NO QUESTION that he has had two children by another woman. That he has abandoned her is also not in doubt and you want to dismiss it all by saying "IF" and TOO BAD, LIFE ISN'T FAIR"?

Why do you have to pretend that there's an "IF"? Denying it doesn't make it go away.

Well, I guess it does for you and Greer.

676 posted on 03/18/2005 7:48:57 PM PST by Badray (Quinn's First Law -- Liberalism ALWAYS generates the exact opposite of its stated intent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies]

To: Torie

I agree. But is the judge obligated not to hasten her death when she enjoys the protection of congress as a witness under supoena. I am curious about that.


677 posted on 03/18/2005 7:48:59 PM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 611 | View Replies]

To: The Red Zone
Well actually he'd be in a world of legal hurt if he dropped his ball at such an offer. He knows that even if the Schindlers settle for peace, tens of thousands who want his head on a post will not.

What have we been told about that??

1 wrong + 1 wrong = 2 wrongs
2 wrongs = ?

;-)

678 posted on 03/18/2005 7:49:01 PM PST by Scenic Sounds (Sí, estamos libres sonreír otra vez - ahora y siempre.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 636 | View Replies]

To: steveo

Nah, just sort of dumb I guess, but please don't let Judges in Florida know about that.


679 posted on 03/18/2005 7:49:11 PM PST by harpo11 (Congress We Need More Steroid in the War on Terror. Let Baseball worry about Baseball.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 608 | View Replies]

To: mjtobias
I only take orders from God.

Now how did I know you'd say that?

680 posted on 03/18/2005 7:49:16 PM PST by sinkspur ("Preach the gospel. If necessary, use words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 1,081-1,093 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson