Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rwfromkansas
I did not think this radical judge would obey Congress unless a federal judge ordered him to do so.

He doesn't have to, unless a federal judge orders him to do so. Congress has no jurisdiction.

913 posted on 03/18/2005 12:21:18 PM PST by ContraryMary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 882 | View Replies ]


To: ContraryMary
He doesn't have to, unless a federal judge orders him to do so. Congress has no jurisdiction.

The minute those subpoenas were issued, congress had jurisiction. Proper procedure is for Michael Schiavo to quash the subpoenas. That wasn't done, feeding tube is removed, contempt of congress, obstruction of justice.

940 posted on 03/18/2005 12:24:40 PM PST by bigeasy_70118
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 913 | View Replies ]

To: ContraryMary
He doesn't have to, unless a federal judge orders him to do so. Congress has no jurisdiction.

Congress has jurisdiction over any witness it subpoenas, unless there is a federal law that says otherwise.

1,131 posted on 03/18/2005 12:51:01 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (In politics, sometimes it's OK for even a Wolverine to root for a Buckeye win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 913 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson