And under Federal law, if a person is under Federal subpoena, it is illegal to do anything to cause them harm. Therefore, the judge is in violation of Federal law. So is Michael, her so-called husband.
Judge Greer would then directly face the Congress, in effect, at which point, he may or may not show contempt for the Congress.
The issues are two:
1) Does the Constitutional power to decide that a person is to die, include a privilege of government, that it remain immune to the result of following due process to the point of affecting the death--- does the government have the power to order death by due process in cases not involving capital punishment?2) Is there sufficient evidence that a majority of medical experts may agree upon, that the patient was subject to some trauma accounting for her structural injuries, that are revealed in some previous tests, and may be revealed in further tests; and therefore, that she may be found to be the victim of foul play, about which, therefore, her fate of death, ordered by the State of Florida, would be repugnant to the foundations of our Constitutions --- that in life and death cases, especially those in which the order affecting death is not punishment for a capital offense, we should not permit any miscarriage of justice?