To: dandelion
Newt Gingrich is on Hannity and he is saying that Greer CANNOT ignore a Congressional subpoena and can be held in contempt.
To: Bigh4u2
Newt Gingrich is on Hannity and he is saying that Greer CANNOT ignore a Congressional subpoena and can be held in contempt. Ok let's see some real action on this then.
1,081 posted on
03/18/2005 12:42:41 PM PST by
Terriergal
(What is the meaning of life?? Man's chief end is to glorify God and to enjoy him for ever.)
To: Bigh4u2
Newt Gingrich is on Hannity and he is saying that Greer CANNOT ignore a Congressional subpoena and can be held in contempt. good point. Ball is in Congresses court.
To: Bigh4u2
He's going to kill her before they can act on the contempt of court, hoping to thereby render the order moot...
To: Bigh4u2; Pride in the USA
Newt Gingrich is on Hannity and he is saying that Greer CANNOT ignore a Congressional subpoena and can be held in contempt. I heard it just a little bit differently. Newt said that this particular subpoena has a SHALL provision in it. He stressed that it was the SHALL provision that makes Greer in contempt. I have no idea what that means. Can anyone clarify what a SHALL provision is, and what its implications are in this matter?
1,139 posted on
03/18/2005 12:51:32 PM PST by
lonevoice
(Vast Right Wing Pajama Party)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson