Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Old Professer
I'm certain this was supposed to make sense, but all I can make of it is a poorly formed, nonsensical slippery slope argument. Can you rephrase this for me so I can understand why you are against removing crappy, beat up, poorly perorming old crap cars from the road? Or if you prefer, why you support the idea of letting 35 year old oil burners on the road? Thanks!
48 posted on 03/17/2005 8:27:33 PM PST by Jokelahoma (Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Jokelahoma
For the same reason the USDA allows a certain percentage of rodent feces, hair and body scraps in hotdogs, I guess, it's called de minimus.

The truly crappy cars will remove themselves from service as they finally sputter and die; all the other reasons you state that may or do represent safety hazards should be controlled by the transportation safety organizations.

72 posted on 03/18/2005 8:18:30 AM PST by Old Professer (A man's conscience is like his garden, it is his and his alone to tend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson